\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}

\begin{document}

{\bf Here are my corrections to the 2001-01-27 version.}

\begin{itemize}


\item 1st arrow page 1 : It is correct.

\item 2nd arrow page 1 : 
We employ 2-loop RGE's for every running mass and coupling
only in the M-SUGRA. The parenthesis should be corrected
to ``for some cases only at the one-loop for the running masses.''

\item 3rd arrow page 1 : ``After transforming ..'' should
be ``After transforming the running $\overline{DR}$ parameters
into..''

\item 4th arrow page 1 : After the word scenario : ``We also comment
on the low energy spectrum in the models under consideration.''

\item Page 2 : A typo in ``...broken Supergravity in {\it in the }
  flat..''

\item 1st arrow  Page 2 : correct

\item 1st arrow  Page 3 : correct

\item footnote 3 : ``This relation....positive'' should be 
``This tree level relation
is of not use here since we employ 1-loop corrections for the
minimization conditions and we reject points where the 1-loop (or
two-loop) Higgs masses squared are negative.''

\item In your comment ``correct?'' : The 
phrase ``(extracted from ..pole masses)'' should be
``extracted from their pole masses which are treated as inputs.''
Regarding also Shufang's comment : we should put after
the word RGE's [41] (for five flavours since the top quark mass has
been decoupled) to derive....''

\item Especially to Shufang : In Ref.[53] there is also another
paper by the same group :

Z.~Chacko, M.~A.~Luty, E.~Ponton, Y.~Shadmi and Y.~Shirman,
``The GUT scale and superpartner masses 
from anomaly mediated  supersymmetry breaking,'' hep-ph/0006047.

Also another solution to the tachyon problem have been proposed by :

I.~Jack and D.~R.~Jones,
``R-symmetry, Yukawa textures and anomaly mediated supersymmetry  breaking,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B491}, 151 (2000)
[hep-ph/0006116].

where is possible if the underlying theory has a gauged R-symmetry.

Another one 

D.~E.~Kaplan and G.~D.~Kribs,
``Gaugino-assisted anomaly mediation,''
JHEP{\bf 0009}, 048 (2000)
[hep-ph/0009195].

presents a model of supersymmetry breaking 
mediated through a small extra dimension. 

I am just wondering whether we should put those citations.


\item  Arrow on page 8 : Actually they are ${\overline{DR}}$ parameters.
The RGE's in SUSY scenarios are always in the ${\overline{DR}}$ scheme
since it is that scheme which preserves the SUSY ward identities
up to two loops. More accurately it is a modified ${\overline{DR}}$ of

I.~Jack, D.~R.~Jones, S.~P.~Martin, M.~T.~Vaughn and Y.~Yamada,
``Decoupling of the epsilon scalar mass in softly broken supersymmetry,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50}, 5481 (1994)
[hep-ph/9407291]

By the way when say RGE's for the first time we must cite :


S.~P.~Martin and M.~T.~Vaughn,
%``Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50}, 2282 (1994)
[hep-ph/9311340];

Y.~Yamada,
%``Two loop renormalization group equations for soft SUSY breaking scalar interactions: Supergraph method,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50}, 3537 (1994)
[hep-ph/9401241].

I.~Jack and D.~R.~Jones,
%``Soft supersymmetry breaking and finiteness,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B333}, 372 (1994)
[hep-ph/9405233].

I.~Jack, D.~R.~Jones, S.~P.~Martin, M.~T.~Vaughn and Y.~Yamada,
%``Decoupling of the epsilon scalar mass in softly broken supersymmetry,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 50}, 5481 (1994)
[hep-ph/9407291]

\item Page 10 : Eq.(19) Only the bound on $m_{\tilde{q}}$ should be
used. For the m-SUGRA that is $m_{\tilde{q}} \le 2.5$ TeV within
the reach of LHC. 

\item Page 10 : I do not think that I agree as you present reference
  [71]. In my paper with Herbi we found that a light sbottom with
a  mass $\le 10$ GeV is disfavoured with the MSSM embedded in
an underlying theory (as it must be the case), {\it unless} the
gluino is light and less than 20 GeV or so. But such a light
gluino is only marginally (if  at all)  allowed by experiment.
So if we put [71] I would like to say the above explicitly.

\item Page 11 : ``The original ....'' I do not think
that References [77-79] are necesary. Why don't we stress the
problem that even LHC will find hard to detect such heavy
spectrum?? (I always dislike those fine tunning things!)

\item Page 11 : As Shufang said in her e-mail :
''$m_0$ in AMSB '' should be ''$m_0$ and $m_{\rm aux}$ in AMSB''

\item Page 13 : Please do not remove case III !! It is very
interesting even without any (present) experimental support.
Actually I discussed with B. Murray on that and he found
it very interesting. He told me that there is a
preliminary over excess when all the (SUSY) Higgses are having
comparable masses of arround 100 GeV but of course we cannot
take it as  grant here!


\item Page 15, below eq.(26) : The CDF bounds are given 
in both maximal-mixing and zero stop mixing. So the statement
we write there is wrong. Interestingly case IIIA survives but
IIIB is excluded by CDF (see fig.2 and 3) of Ref.[84]. 
So I suggest : ``The ``allowed'' models in case (III) are just
around the corner of being excluded by the CDF Higgs boson search.''
Nothing else....We should remove case IIIB. 


\item  Page 15 : ``In Fig.2..'' paragraph. I think we exclude
most points with $M_A>1500$ GeV because of the REWSB or from the
Higgs searces (small $\tan\beta$.). The 
$\Delta\rho$ bound should not be applied there since the
MSSM looks like SM and the latter agrees with experiment.
As it is written is also in contradiction of what we say below.
The statement should be corrected as :
``All models with $M_A \ge 1500$ GeV have been rejected 
mainly from REWSB and CCB constraints as well from 
Higgs searches (in small $\tan\beta region)$). Thus, we obtain
an upper bound of $M_A\simeq 1.5$ TeV in the m-SUGRA scenario.''


\item I found the conclusions quite good! Bravo Sven!! 

\item Page 30 : Ackowledgements :  Please add :

A.D would like to thank Herbi Dreiner, Bill Murray and M. Kobel 
for illuminating discussions on the  Higgs Searches at LEP. A.D also 
would like to acknowledge  the 
European Program RTN-HPRN-CT-2000-00148, ``Physics Across
the Present Energy Frontier: Probing the Origin of Mass'' for 
financial support.


\item Please do not forget to remove footnote 9!!!!
and the apologies (we do not have to apologize  we did our best!)

\item Univ. of Bonn has abolished the preprint number. 
So please remove that from the frontpage.

\item It is great I think! 
  

\end{itemize}

Sakis

\end{document}