\relax 
\bibstyle{apsrev}
\citation{mSUGRA}
\citation{history}
\citation{BNL}
\citation{Feng}
\citation{Nath}
\citation{Nanopoulos}
\citation{Arnowitt}
\citation{Choi}
\citation{Martin}
\citation{Gomez}
\citation{Kim}
\citation{Sven}
\citation{Barger}
\citation{Fauzi}
\citation{Roszkowski}
\citation{Lahanas}
\citation{Masiero}
\citation{Masiero}
\citation{Urban}
\citation{Babu}
\citation{Chankowski}
\citation{Urban}
\citation{Babu}
\citation{Chankowski}
\citation{cgnw}
\newlabel{FirstPage}{{}{1}}
\citation{cgnw}
\citation{BNL}
\citation{LEPhiggs}
\citation{mSUGRA}
\citation{Feng}
\citation{Lahanas}
\citation{ASBS}
\citation{Burasreview}
\citation{fbs}
\citation{CDFbmumu}
\citation{LHCb}
\citation{Inami}
\citation{Krawczyk}
\citation{Buchalla}
\citation{He}
\citation{Chankowski}
\citation{Nierste}
\citation{Urban}
\citation{Maxim}
\citation{Babu}
\citation{Urban}
\citation{Burasreview}
\citation{Masiero}
\citation{Ali}
\newlabel{heff}{{1}{2}}
\newlabel{smbmumu}{{2}{2}}
\newlabel{expbmumu}{{3}{2}}
\citation{Urban}
\citation{REWSB}
\citation{ASBS}
\citation{CDFbmumu}
\citation{BNL}
\citation{Nierste}
\citation{LEPhiggs}
\newlabel{hamiltonian}{{4}{3}}
\newlabel{operators}{{7}{3}}
\newlabel{brancing}{{8}{3}}
\citation{Roszkowski}
\citation{Shadmi}
\citation{Stuart}
\citation{Baer}
\citation{Stuart}
\citation{CDFbmumu}
\bibcite{BNL}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{LEPhiggs}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{mSUGRA}{{3}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{history}{{4}{}{{}}{{}}}
\citation{mSUGRA}
\bibcite{Feng}{{5}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nath}{{6}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nanopoulos}{{7}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Arnowitt}{{8}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Choi}{{9}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Martin}{{10}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Gomez}{{11}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kim}{{12}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Sven}{{13}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Barger}{{14}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Fauzi}{{15}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Roszkowski}{{16}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Lahanas}{{17}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{cgnw}{{18}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{ASBS}{{19}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Burasreview}{{20}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{fbs}{{21}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{CDFbmumu}{{22}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{LHCb}{{23}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Inami}{{24}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Krawczyk}{{25}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Buchalla}{{26}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{He}{{27}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nierste}{{28}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Urban}{{29}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Choudhury}{{30}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Babu}{{31}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chankowski}{{32}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Maxim}{{33}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Masiero}{{34}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ali}{{35}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{REWSB}{{36}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ellis}{{37}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Shadmi}{{38}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Stuart}{{39}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Baer}{{40}{}{{}}{{}}}
\global \chardef \firstnote@num40\relax 
\bibcite{endnote41}{{41}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote42}{{42}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote43}{{43}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote44}{{44}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote45}{{45}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote46}{{46}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{endnote47}{{47}{}{{}}{{}}}
\citation{Ellis}
\bibcite{endnote48}{{48}{}{{}}{{}}}
\newlabel{LastBibItem}{{48}{5}}
\citation{CDFbmumu}
\citation{CDFbmumu}
\citation{BNL}
\citation{BNL}
\newlabel{LastPage}{{}{5}}
\global\NAT@numberstrue
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces The predicted SUSY contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic $\delta a_\mu $ (bottom), versus the predicted branching ratio $B_s\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-$\nobreakspace  {} (left) for the input values of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators tan}\nolimits \beta $ (top) in an indicative mSUGRA point [$M_{1/2}=450, M_0=350, A_0=0, \mu >0, m_t=175$ GeV]. We plot the both LO and NLO corrections to $B_s\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-$\nobreakspace  {} together with the SM prediction and the present bound by CDF\nobreakspace  {}\cite {CDFbmumu}, $B_s\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-$$ < 2.6\times 10^{-6}$ at 95\% CL. The regions where the SUSY contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment is such that the present deviation with the SM is recovered at $1\sigma $ and $2\sigma $ is also shown. $f_{B_s}$ has been chosen to be 230 MeV.}}{6}}
\newlabel{fig1}{{1}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Contour plots (solid lines) of the predicted Branching Ratio $B_s\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-$on the plane $M_{0},M_{1/2}$ in the mSUGRA scenario and for $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators tan}\nolimits \beta =50, A_0=0, \mu >0, m_t=175$ GeV. The fully shaded region is excluded from both theoretical [REWSB(left-upper corner),not neutralino LSP(down)] and experimental [susy and higgs searches (mainly left strip till 1 TeV $M_0$ approximately)] facts. The shaded-dotted region shows the prediction of this mSUGRA point for the muon anomalous magnetic moment [in units $10^{-10}$] being within $2 \sigma $ of the value reported in \cite {BNL}. Contours with the light Higgs boson mass equal to 115,120,121 are also shown (dotted-dashed lines). Here $f_{B_s}=230$ MeV. }}{6}}
\newlabel{fig2}{{2}{6}}