\@doendnote{endnote8}{It is not hard to generalize to a unitary transformation, Marc Thormeier, {\protect \it  unpublished}. In that case one can get rid of the phase of $\kappa _i$ as well.}
\@doendnote{endnote9}{Throught this paper we assume that the vacuum expectation values are real.}
\@doendnote{endnote10}{We have corrected the sign error for the $\mu _\alpha $ parameter in Eq.(3.2) of \cite {Haber}. We would like to thank H. Haber for communication.}
\@doendnote{endnote11}{ We used the notation $(\mathaccent "0365\relax {\protect \cal  W}^\pm ={\begingroup 1\endgroup \over \protect \sqrt  {2}} (\mathaccent "0365\relax {\protect \cal  W}^{(1)}\mp i \mathaccent "0365\relax {\protect \cal  W}^{(2)})$.}
\@doendnote{endnote12}{A typo in $\gamma ^{(1)E_j}_{E_i}$ of \cite {add} has been corrected.}
\@doendnote{endnote13}{For the gaugino masses a knowledge of the $\beta $-function of the gauge couplings is also neccecary. Since the $\not \mskip -\thinmuskip \mskip -\thinmuskip R_p$-couplings do not affect the gaugino masses at one loop one can use the gaugino RGEs directly from\protect \nobreakspace  {}\cite {mv}.}